State Agency · Employment Development Department
Community Economic Resilience Fund Program Evaluation Program Year 2022-23
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Employment Development Department
Funding
Funding amount not specified
Closes
December 6, 2022
NAICS
485
Similar grants still open
- Delta Community, Environment, and Climate Grant ProgramSacramento-San Joaquin Delta Conservancy · closes October 23, 2026
- Emergency Medical Services Technical Assistance (EMS TA) Solicitation for Proposals (SFP) for Program Year 2026 (PY 26-27)Employment Development Department · closes October 27, 2026
- Cooperative Agreement for Affiliated Partner with the Southern Appalachian Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU)Geological Survey · closes October 30, 2026
- F26AS00071 Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund: Habitat Conservation Plan Land Acquisition GrantsFish and Wildlife Service · closes October 30, 2026
- F25AS00379 Highlands Conservation Act - Base Funding RoundFish and Wildlife Service · closes October 31, 2026
- RESTORE Act Direct Component – Construction and Real Property Acquisition ActivitiesU.S. Dept. of Treasury RESTORE Act Program · closes October 31, 2026
- RESTORE Act Direct Component - Non-Construction ActivitiesU.S. Dept. of Treasury RESTORE Act Program · closes October 31, 2026
- F25AS00332 Highlands Conservation Act – Competitive Funding RoundFish and Wildlife Service · closes October 31, 2026
The purpose of the evaluation is to provide data-driven, evidence-based responses to the following evaluation broad questions: 1. Whether and how did CERF achieve its objectives? 2. Did CERF have unintended effects (positive and/or negative)? If so, what types? 3. Was CERF cost-effective? How much did impact on outcomes cost? 4. Could the ‘inclusive planning model’ be used to scale-up other State efforts to build more equitable, sustainable, and carbon-neutral economy? In collaboration with the CERF leadership team and the regional High Road Transition Collaboratives (HRTCs), the evaluator will lead the design and implementation of the evaluation plan for the planning and implementation phases of CERF. The implementation phase includes multiple rounds of implementation and a pilot phase. The evaluator should ensure the evaluation follows best practices for rigorous, transparent, and reproducible analysis. The evaluator is expected to serve as a learning partner and provide data-driven recommendations to inform the decisions of the Inter-Agency Leadership Team and the HRTCs. The outputs of the evaluation, including progress reports and evaluation analysis reports, will inform adaptations, shifts, and recommendations to the work as new lessons emerge with the goal to support real-time feedback and learning. The evaluation should be (i) relevant and meaningful by responding to the needs of Inter-Agency Leadership Team and regional partners, (ii) rely on as rigorous methods as feasible to examine the quality and quantity of CERF outputs as well as CERF’s contribution to improvements in outcomes, and (iii) responsible in how personally identifiable information (PII) and/or sensitive data is collected, stored, and potentially shared to balance transparency with protection of confidentiality. The evaluator should be resilient as demonstrated through impartiality while ensuring the analysis and interpretation of analysis are credible, unbiased, and as transparent and reproducible as feasible.
Eligibility
- Programs related to transit
Award details
Applications close on December 6, 2022.
Categories
Disaster Recovery · Sustainability
This grant is no longer accepting applications. Get matched to open grants like it, or browse the ones above.
See similar open grants ↑Applications closed — listing kept for reference.·Source: California Grants Portal·Last seen Oct 23, 2026
