State Agency · Employment Development Department
Community Economic Resilience Fund Program Evaluation Program Year 2022-23
Last updated: September 7, 2026
Employment Development Department
Funding
Funding amount not specified
Closes
December 6, 2022
NAICS
485
Similar grants still open
- Wetland Mitigation Banking Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2026Natural Resources Conservation Service · closes September 8, 2026
- Tribal Wildfire Resilience Grants Solicitation 2026Department of Forestry and Fire Protection · closes September 8, 2026
- IUSE / Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED)U.S. National Science Foundation · closes September 8, 2026
- Southwest Border Resource Protection ProgramNational Park Service · closes September 8, 2026
- Outreach and Assistance for Veteran Farmers and Ranchers ProgramNational Institute of Food and Agriculture · closes September 10, 2026
- Forest Legacy Program - FY2028 FundingForest Service · closes September 11, 2026
- FY26 Bureau of Land Management Threatened and Endangered Species - Bureau wideBureau of Land Management · closes September 11, 2026
- FY26 Bureau of Land Management Wildlife Resource Management Program - Bureau wideBureau of Land Management · closes September 11, 2026
The purpose of the evaluation is to provide data-driven, evidence-based responses to the following evaluation broad questions: 1. Whether and how did CERF achieve its objectives? 2. Did CERF have unintended effects (positive and/or negative)? If so, what types? 3. Was CERF cost-effective? How much did impact on outcomes cost? 4. Could the ‘inclusive planning model’ be used to scale-up other State efforts to build more equitable, sustainable, and carbon-neutral economy? In collaboration with the CERF leadership team and the regional High Road Transition Collaboratives (HRTCs), the evaluator will lead the design and implementation of the evaluation plan for the planning and implementation phases of CERF. The implementation phase includes multiple rounds of implementation and a pilot phase. The evaluator should ensure the evaluation follows best practices for rigorous, transparent, and reproducible analysis. The evaluator is expected to serve as a learning partner and provide data-driven recommendations to inform the decisions of the Inter-Agency Leadership Team and the HRTCs. The outputs of the evaluation, including progress reports and evaluation analysis reports, will inform adaptations, shifts, and recommendations to the work as new lessons emerge with the goal to support real-time feedback and learning. The evaluation should be (i) relevant and meaningful by responding to the needs of Inter-Agency Leadership Team and regional partners, (ii) rely on as rigorous methods as feasible to examine the quality and quantity of CERF outputs as well as CERF’s contribution to improvements in outcomes, and (iii) responsible in how personally identifiable information (PII) and/or sensitive data is collected, stored, and potentially shared to balance transparency with protection of confidentiality. The evaluator should be resilient as demonstrated through impartiality while ensuring the analysis and interpretation of analysis are credible, unbiased, and as transparent and reproducible as feasible.
Eligibility
- Programs related to transit
Award details
Applications close on December 6, 2022.
Categories
Disaster Recovery · Sustainability
This grant is no longer accepting applications. Get matched to open grants like it, or browse the ones above.
See similar open grants ↑Applications closed — listing kept for reference.·Source: California Grants Portal·Last seen Sep 7, 2026
